A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Highest 601] The Defendant, from November 201 to September 201, was in charge of the overall duties of the victim F, a substantial operator of the victim F, Inc., Ltd., Ltd., which was located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Young-si E from November 201.

On February 1, 2011, the Defendant, at the above office, remitted KRW 7,300,000, which was kept on duty for the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in his own name G, and then arbitrarily remitted KRW 5,300,000 to the account in his name to discharge his obligation.

In addition, from that time to July 8, 2011, the Defendant embezzled a total of KRW 267,300,000, which was kept on duty for the victim eight times as shown in the attached crime list.

[2013 Highest 3932]

1. On September 201, 201, the Defendant forged public document documents at the F Office of the Company F, Inc., Ltd. located in Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-si, the part of the representative column among the above company’s business registration certificate and the part of the statement of “J and I” in the representative column among the above company’s construction business registration certificate is placed in each knife, and the part of the statement of “A”, which was printed on each knife by computer, was affixed with each attachment of the copy of “A” written on each knife, and forged a business registration certificate under the name of the head

In this way, the defendant has forged official documents without authority for the purpose of uttering.

2. Around March 18, 2012, the Defendant sent the forged official document brokerage document to K’s e-mail, including the forged business registration certificate and the image file contained in the construction business registration certificate, at the above office.

In this way, the defendant held each forged official document.

[2013 Highest 5773] The Defendant, upon delegation by I and J, was a joint representative director of F Co., Ltd., and at his/her own discretion, did not obtain individual delegation from J and I.