beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On January 7, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of injury, etc. at the Busan District Court, and the judgment was finalized on January 15, 2015.
Although the defendant did not have been duly delegated by the victim C even though he did not have been properly delegated, he purchased a new mobile phone use service in the name of the victim, and had been provided with a mobile phone terminal due to new subscription to pay money by disposing of it in the middle.
1. On January 15, 2014, in order to present and exercise the certified transcript of corporate register, etc. at the F of the operation of the E in Busan Northern District, the Defendant: (a) drafted a new contract form, which is a private document concerning rights and duties, by allowing E to sign “(State)C”, “G”, “G”, and “A and room” on the customer information column of the service contract site kept at the same time by using an insular pen, with the intent of presenting and exercising the certified copy of corporate register, etc. from the F of the operation of the E in Busan Northern District; and (b) allowing E to sign “A”, “A” and “A” on the customer information column of the application for subscription to the
In addition, from that time until February 24, 2014, the Defendant drafted a new service contract 31 copies, recognizing the victim's proxy qualification throughout 31 times in the same manner as the list of crimes in the attached Table.
2. Around January 15, 2014, the Defendant issued a new service contract prepared by recognizing the victim’s proxy qualification as stated in paragraph 1 from the above F to E and exercised it as if it had been duly formed.
In addition, from that time until February 24, 2014, the Defendant issued 31 copies of a new service contract each through 31 times in the same manner as indicated in the attached list of crimes, and exercised it.
3. The Defendant’s fraud is the victim E from the above F around January 15, 2014.