Defendants are not guilty.

1. Defendant A (53, 53, 52) and Defendant B (52) are married couples.

1. On April 27, 2017, Defendant A: (a) discovered and stolen a paper stuff that contains food, such as the victim E (29 years of age, female)’s net height of 58,230 won at the market price of the victim E (29 years of age, female) in the lower tier of the 1st floor of the ground, and (b) moved into the parking lot exit of the 1st floor of the ground and was loaded into the lower seat of the her husband’s her husband’s seat, and was loaded into the lower seat of the 3rd vehicle of the FM 3 vehicle waiting by Defendant B.

2. Defendant B waiting to the exit of his “F” MF3 vehicle at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph 1, and loaded the above paper stuff that Defendant A stolen, while driving the vehicle, and her driver off the vehicle, and she was able to prevent the Defendant A by facilitating the theft.

2. Determination

A. The burden of proof for the criminal facts prosecuted in a criminal trial is to be borne by a public prosecutor, and the conviction of guilt is to be based on evidence with probative value that makes a judge feel true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, even if there is suspicion of guilt against the defendant, it shall be determined with the benefit of the defendant (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2001Do2823, Aug. 21, 2001). B. The following facts are acknowledged according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court.

(1) On April 27, 201, around 13:01, the victim purchased foodstuffs as indicated in the facts charged in the instant building (hereinafter “instant building”). around that time, the victim had a paper stuffing room (hereinafter “instant objects”) containing the said foodstuffs and left the front of the entrance door of the instant building and the first floor parking lot.

(2) The Defendants are the instant building around April 27, 2017.