Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in driving a wing truck vehicle B.

On April 27, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 02:20 on April 27, 2016, and driven the front road of the new engineer distance from the shooting distance to the shooting distance of the free park.

Since there is a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed, it was confirmed whether a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive according to the new subparagraph after checking whether he/she is a person to reduce the speed and to see well the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the victim C (the 17-year old) and the victim D (the 17-year old age), who opened the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals, to go to the ground from the direction of the embankment, by the negligence of left-hand turn, even though the pedestrian signal was a green signal.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C, such as a pellet, which requires medical treatment for about three months, due to the above occupational negligence, and the chest straw, which requires medical treatment for about three weeks, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of C and D;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of CCTV photographs to Acts and subordinate statutes at the time an accident occurs;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the community service order [the scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines] - The sentencing guidelines does not present the guidelines for the regular concurrent crimes, but the scope of recommendations for the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is from August to 2 years (the injury caused by traffic accidents) of the credit cooperative.