The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Facts charged;

A. On July 19, 2016, around 16:15, the Defendant: (a) expressed to the victim E (hereinafter “victim”) and the husband F of the victim’s husband F in the front of the “D” restaurant located in Busan-gun, Busan-gun (hereinafter “C”); (b) expressed to the victim and the victim’s husband F expressed his or her will to the Defendant’s personal seal on the new wall; (c) however, the victim and F reported that there is any defect G, etc. that the victim and F did not have to do so, “A false horses;”

The young year, match year, worn out and worn out, and worn out, were publicly insultingd and insulting the victim by openly insultingly speaking as “the young year, anywhere,”.

B. Although F, at the same time and place as the above paragraph A, was engaged in dangerous work that the victim’s husband, at the same time and place as the victim’s above paragraph (a), was able to repair the electric lighting on the bridge, F reported the Defendant’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’

In addition, whether he is a crime of assault or not

“In the way of harming the victim’s left side from the parking lot, the victim’s chest was tightly pushed up about 3 times, and the victim’s chest part was tightly pushed up on the left side of the parking lot.

2. The facts charged as stated in Article 311 of the Criminal Act are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the prosecution may be instituted only when the victim files a complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. The facts charged as stated in Article 312(1)-2 of the Criminal Act are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, it can be recognized that a written agreement was submitted in the victim's name to the effect that the defendant withdraws the complaint against the defendant on February 17, 2017, which was after the prosecution of this case, and that the defendant does not want to be punished. Thus, all of the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 and subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.