logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.08.16 2016가단108547
구상금
Text

1. The Defendants: (a) each of the Plaintiff KRW 10,580,000, and Defendant from December 29, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. As to the Plaintiff’s vehicle A (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”), Defendant Samsung Fire Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samsung 1”) entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to Defendant Samsung 1’s vehicle B (hereinafter “Defendant 1”), and Defendant Dong Fire Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant 2”), respectively.

B. Around 21:20 on July 19, 2013, the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle at a point near the Western East-dong IIC Group located in the central highway located in Ansan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, and went through safety measures for the following vehicles, following the collision between the central separation zone with the driver’s care and the first median line, stopping on the center side of the first lane, and driving the vehicle at the speed of emergency, etc.

(hereinafter referred to as "first accident")

C. After the first accident, the following vehicles are proceeding along the second lane. However, Defendant 1’s vehicle, who followed the second accident, did not find the Plaintiff vehicle due to the sudden malfunction due to the centralized rain, resulting in an accident that led to the Plaintiff’s subsequent failure to see the Plaintiff’s vehicle in the part of Defendant 1’s driver’s seat.

(hereinafter referred to as “the second accident”). Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s vehicle reconfiscing and reconfising the central separation zone and stopped on the first lane.

After the second accident, Defendant 2, who followed Defendant 1, found the Plaintiff’s vehicle late, and again collisioned the back part of Defendant 2’s vehicle with the front part of Defendant 2.

(hereinafter referred to as “third-party accident”). (e)

The Plaintiff paid KRW 31,740,000 as insurance money to the owner of the Plaintiff’s vehicle in accordance with the special agreement for securing self-vehicle under the comprehensive automobile insurance contract.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's 1, 2, 3, and 6, Eul's 1, Eul's 1, Eul's 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. According to the above facts of recognition, each of the above traffic accidents and vehicles of the Plaintiff and the Defendants are the occurrence of accidents.

arrow