logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.05.20 2013고정600
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 1.5 million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 12, 2013, at around 02:00, the Defendant driven a car with approximately 3 km of 0.067% of blood alcohol content at around 02:20, from the front of an influent restaurant near Kimcheon-dong, Kimcheon-si, to the front road of the Dobong-gu, Kimcheon-si, Ycheon-si, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at around 0.067% of blood alcohol content.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the report on the status of a drinking driver;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act of the choice of punishment (the punishment shall be determined by taking into account the fact that the act causes a traffic accident due to the crime committed on the market, the fact that the vehicle indicated in the circumstances as follows is left alone and thus causes an obstacle to preventing danger and smooth communication on the road, and the punishment shall be determined, taking into account the fact that there is no criminal power, the drinking water level is minor, and the fact that the defendant himself is significantly different);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. At around 02:20 on May 12, 2013, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.067%, was driving forward the way front of the salary class elementary school in the Ycheon-si, Gcheon-si, Gecheon-si, Gecheon-si, Gecheon-si, Gecheon-si, Gecheon-si, Gecheon-si

Since there are many vehicles parked in rural areas and residential areas, there were duty of care to confirm and operate the career safety by properly examining the bank in such cases.

Nevertheless, if the driver's vehicle is driven along the front side of the driver's vehicle due to negligence while under the influence of alcohol, the driver's full side of the driver's vehicle was loaded on the right side of the victim's off, which is owned by the victim D, parked on the left side of the driver's vehicle, and the driver's vehicle was loaded on the left side of the victim's Gpoter II truck parked parked on the left side of the course.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the above-mentioned work-based negligence that leads to KRW 1,615,319 of the repair cost for the above-owned E vehicle. F.

arrow