logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.08.28 2014고단814
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CM5 car.

On February 18, 2014, at around 08:10, the Defendant driven the said car with a alcohol content of 0.067% 0.067%, and proceeded one way in front of the 335 lusan village hall No. 335-ro, pulp, pulp, pulp, pulp, pulp, pulp, pulp, pulp.

Since there is a center line of yellow-ray, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to thoroughly see the front-time and safely drive the car line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led the victim F (the 47 years old) who was driving on the opposite side by the negligence of driving the central line, to shocked the front part of the E-Poter's driver's seat and left side of the E-Poter's driver's vehicle, and caused the victim F (the 47 years old) who was driving by the following, with the above Poter's cargo pushed back, to shocked the front part of the G Poter's car.

After all, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, approximately 12 weeks of injury to the above D, such as knenee, after knee, knenee, and a scarke wall that requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment from the above F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident of D or F;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. A written report from an employee of an employer;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (related to the application of the Tramark);

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 2 and 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts and the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148-2 (2) and (3) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Determination of imprisonment without prison labor for the crime of violating the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment and the Road Traffic Act;

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

arrow