logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.06.14 2017고정695
사기
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of 2 million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

C From March 9, 2015 to October 31, 2015, from around October 31, 2015, a loan advertisement is placed on a daily information site (an intersection, etc.) distributed to one of the loan companies in Seoul and other Seoul (hereinafter referred to as “the intersection”) to those who are unable to receive a loan normally from the loan companies due to low credit rating in the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building 305 and 310, and the personal information of those who reported the advertisement is used to certify the false employment (title work loan) by using the personal information of those who reported it, and thereby allowing the victim companies to obtain a loan from the loan companies (i.e., mountain, money, Loned Cop, R&C, etc.) and acquiring 55% of the loan in return for it.

1. On September 7, 2015, Defendant B conspiredd to receive loans from victims through verification of the victim’s 305 service in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government DD Building 305, and applied for each loan to the victim (State) social and victim SBI corporation by telephone, and based on the company information known to C while communicating with the loan manager, Defendant B made a false statement that “E is working, wages are received in cash, and phone numbers are received in cash,” and C confirmed to the effect that the Defendant was working for the said company.

However, there was no fact that the defendant had served E.

The Defendant received KRW 7 million from the victim SBI Co., Ltd. to the corporate bank account (G) of the Defendant, and transferred KRW 3 million to the same account as a loan from the victim (state) around September 8, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with C to acquire property by deceiving each victims.

2. On December 16, 2014, Defendant A conspired to receive a loan from the victims through false proof of employment with C at the same place as C around December 16, 2014, and by telephone, the victim was the victim’s mountain and money, and the victim.

arrow