The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal. 2. The judgment of this court does not have the criminal power imposed on the defendant for a crime similar to that of a similar type, and although the defendant is divided into his errors, it seems that the sentence is determined by considering the above circumstances in the first instance court. The scale of the business of arranging the sexual traffic in this case is large and a relatively long period of time, and other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime in this case, as a whole, it is difficult to view that the sentence of imprisonment of one year imposed on the defendant by the first instance court is too unreasonable, and the above argument by the defendant disputing this point is not acceptable.

3. Accordingly, we cannot accept the Defendant’s appeal under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.