beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
Reasons
1. On July 12, 2015, the Defendant: “Around July 12, 2015, the Defendant borrowed KRW 2,000-2,500,000 from the phone from a person without his name (one name C) to a bank account; (b) notified the account number (D) of the Defendant’s name to the person without his name; (c) on July 13, 2015, the Defendant was a plan to transfer the victim’s deposit to the Internet bank by using the victim’s bank account information, etc., rather than the prosecution investigator; and (d) even if the Defendant was an investigator of the Busan District Public Prosecutor’s Office, who was an investigator of the Busan District Public Prosecutor’s Office, and the victim’s account was confirmed from the account of the Busan District Public Prosecutor’s bank, and thus, has to protect the amount deposited in the account until the completion of investigation.
The phrase “a person who connects the Internet Bank website of the National Bank to a certified letter of certification, and requests the identification of the OTP password,” was identified from the victim, and then entered the victim’s information without authority, and transferred KRW 30,000,000 from the national bank account in the victim’s name to the above bank account in the victim’s name.
On July 13, 2015, the Defendant issued a loan to the non-titled person of the trade name in front of the old world in the coffee shop in the inner world of the city of Ansan-si on July 13, 2015, and then to the non-named person “30,000,000 won has been deposited from C” from the non-named person.
“Along with the knowledge that the Defendant’s account was used for the commission of the Defendant’s phishing crime of a person without his name (one name C), “” tried to withdraw in cash the said amount of KRW 30,000,000 deposited into the account in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant at the point near the territory of the Republic of Korea, or transfer it to the Defendant’s father’s account in the name of his father.
As a result, the defendant acquires property benefits of KRW 30,000,000 from the person who was injured by his name.