1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From the end of February 2016, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the Daniology department D (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) located in the Jeonsi-si, Jeonsi-si, Jeonsi-si, Jeonsi-si (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”). On March 2, 2016, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant hospital and discharged on March 5, 2016, after receiving “non-major corrective and Deflacing surgery” from the Defendant’s hospital, and was discharged on March 4, 2016 when the Plaintiff was hospitalized on March 4, 2016. According to the Defendant’s instruction, the nurse administered DNA, etc. at the Plaintiff’s ambane.

B. On March 7, 2016, the Plaintiff re-hospitalized the Defendant Hospital on the ground of acute hepatitis, etc., and discharged on March 9, 2016. On March 7, 2016, the Plaintiff appealed to the nurse at the hospitalization room twice on March 7, 2016, and on March 8, 2016, the Plaintiff complained of her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son

C. From March 11, 2016 to March 30, 2016, the Plaintiff received outpatient treatment five times at Defendant Hospital, and the Plaintiff did not mention her but his/her her her her macker pain.

On April 14, 2016, the Plaintiff established the Defendant hospital and proposed that the Defendant be able to receive re-medical treatment from the general public after making soup, because the Plaintiff did not appeal to the heat, pain, fry, fry, heat, etc., although the Plaintiff was suspected of being satched.

Accordingly, on April 15, 2016, the Plaintiff is a member of the E Family Department, F Hospital on April 16, 2016, and 2016

4. On April 19, 201, at the G Hospital on G Hospital on April 19, 2016, she was diagnosed as “the flock’s flock’s flock’s flock’s flock’s flock’s flock’s flock’s flock’s flock’s flock’s flock’s flock’s flock’s flock’s flock’s fl