logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.11.22 2015나12346
소유권이전등기 말소
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

The reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is as follows: "R is a lineal descendant of K 20 years old, and at the latest, at the time of each of the above-mentioned preservation registration and ownership transfer registration, the plaintiff's clan is deemed to have the substance of the religious clan as a juristic person separate from G at the time of the above-mentioned preservation registration and ownership transfer registration. In particular, in the case of the land remaining other than the land No. 1 of the annexed Table 1 among the land of this case, the ownership of the G clan was originally owned." The additional evidence submitted at the trial of the court of the first instance, which is insufficient to recognize the defendants' assertion, is the same as the reasons for the judgment of the first instance except for the rejection of the additional statement No. 4 and 5 of the evidence.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants shall be accepted in its entirety on the grounds of its reasoning, and since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, the appeal by the defendants is dismissed in its entirety on the grounds of its ground, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow