A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 29, 2014, the Defendant was subject to the disposition of having been suspected of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act at the Gwangju District Public Prosecutor's Office, and the above case was that the Defendant reported telephone loan letters to the person who misrepresented the lending company and transferred the physical card connected to the account under the name of the Defendant.

In addition, around January 23, 2018, the Defendant was subject to a disposition of fraud aiding and abetting at the Incheon District Public Prosecutor's Office, and the above case was investigated by the Incheon Bupyeong Police Station as the above case around September 21, 2017, under the name of the so-called "work loan" in which transaction performance would be increased by the instructions of the name-free winners who misrepresented the lending company, and around September 5, 2017, the Defendant sent the amount of Bosing damage deposited in the account under the name of the Defendant to the Bosing staff.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On December 8, 2017, around 15:46, at the Seocheon Branch of the Incheon District Association B, the Defendant: (a) received instructions from the person in charge of loans in the name of the C company that the so-called “work loan” deposited money in the account; (b) withdrawn the money according to the instructions and deposited it into another account; and (c) withdrawn the amount of KRW 4 million deposited in the B association account in the name of the Defendant’s name and deposited into the account of the F bank account in the name of E.

However, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was investigated by the police station on the grounds of the so-called “work loan” and was investigated by the police station. As such, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the said KRW 4 million was the source of the fee for the payment of the fee for the payment of the fee for the payment of the fee for

On the other hand, a name-free person who assumes the “H” of the C Company’s staff member may provide a loan from around 16:00 on December 7, 2017 to the victim I by 4% to 8.9% of the interest to the maximum of 80,000,000,000 won. However, due to the lack of points, a loan may be granted by taking up the points through partial repayment of the existing loan.

The Court made a false statement to the effect that ‘the direct telephone will be repaid', and this is the defendant from the victim.