1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On February 28, 2007, the Defendant obtained approval of a project plan to create D from the Do governor of Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, and implemented D development projects (hereinafter “instant development projects”) with authorization for a land substitution plan on May 13, 2008.

On July 3, 2008, the Plaintiff filed an application for occupancy or use permission (hereinafter “instant application”) with the Defendant on the public waters (hereinafter “instant public waters”) in the area of 630 square meters of F forest land in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do (hereinafter “instant public waters”). Around August 8, 2008, the Defendant permitted the Plaintiff to use the instant public waters by the period of permission up to August 7, 2010, and granted the Plaintiff the period of permission until the completion of the instant development project. Upon completion of the project, the Plaintiff added a condition of permission that the Plaintiff should move after removing the building constructed on the instant land (hereinafter “instant building”).

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). The Plaintiff newly constructed the instant building on the instant land and obtained approval for use from the Defendant on December 29, 2009, and completed registration of initial ownership on January 7, 2010.

The instant development project was completed on April 21, 2010.

On August 6, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for permission to change the occupancy and use of public waters to the effect that the occupancy and use period of the public waters in this case is permanently changed. However, on August 9, 2010, the Defendant returned the application for permission to change the occupancy and use of public waters to the Defendant on the ground that it is impossible to extend the occupancy and use period for a limited period

The plaintiff's land in this case is the individual property inherited by the plaintiff from before the vessel, and the plaintiff's assertion of the purport of Gap's 1 to 3 and Eul's 1 to 8 (including the number of branch numbers, if any).

Nevertheless, the defendant does not go through legitimate procedures against the plaintiff.