1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim extended by this court, is modified as follows.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the facts is as follows: (a) except for the deletion of the “paragraph (c)” of the second to third to fourth to fourth is identical to the ground for the second to seventh to third to seventh to the judgment of the first instance; and (b) thereby, this part of the judgment is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. Part 1) The following facts and circumstances revealed from witness H’s testimony as seen earlier, namely, ① the amount of contingent remuneration to be paid to the assistant under Article 27 of the Gap evidence No. 4 (Rules). ② The head of the business team of the defendant company agreed to be paid 100% of the amount of contingent remuneration, but he received only 50% of the amount of contingent remuneration. The defendant has an obligation to pay 1,106,178 won to the plaintiff as contingent remuneration for 1,000 won and 20% of the amount of contingent remuneration for 2,000 won (per 2,00,000 won). The defendant has an obligation to pay 1,106,178 won to the plaintiff as contingent remuneration for 1,00 won and 30% of the amount of contingent remuneration for 20% of the amount of contingent remuneration for 50% of the amount of contingent remuneration for 20% of the amount of contingent remuneration for 30% of the amount of contingent remuneration for 20% per investment unit (per 2000%).

B. According to Article 12(2) of the Business Regulations, the Plaintiff’s fee for the initial recruitment of the team leader is 6% and the initial recruitment fee of the head of the headquarters is 3.3% and the difference is 3.3%, which is a single unit of the team leader.