logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.06.04 2019나6789
임금
Text

All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne individually by each person.

Reasons

1. The first instance court rendered a judgment dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim on the merits of the lawsuit, and the Defendant’s claim for the return of unjust enrichment against advance payment of all kinds of premiums, the full acceptance of the claim, the claim for return of unjust enrichment due to private use of corporate card, and the claim for return of unjust enrichment against the money paid in the name of retirement allowance.

The plaintiff appealed against the part against the plaintiff as to the counterclaim, and the defendant appealed only to the part of the claim for return of unjust enrichment due to private use of the corporate card price among the part against the defendant as to the counterclaim. Thus, the judgment of this court is limited to the defendant's claim for return of unjust enrichment, the claim for return of unjust enrichment due to private use of the corporate card price, and the claim for return of unjust enrichment due to the defendant'

2. The court's explanation concerning this case is based on the second-class judgment of the court of first instance.

Paragraph 3) is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, other than those used as described in the following Paragraph 3, and therefore, it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 3. The Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff is liable to use the corporate card price for KRW 15,476,290 in total on 132 occasions from October 1, 2014 to March 23, 2016 with the corporate card of the Gwangju Bank Corporation Corporation, and that the Plaintiff is liable to use the corporate card price for a total of KRW 7,635,850 in total on 82 occasions from December 5, 2015 to May 23, 2016 with the corporate bank card, and that the Plaintiff is obligated to use the corporate card price for unjust enrichment on the corporate card’s private use, KRW 23,112,140, and delay damages on the corporate card’s account of the testimony and the testimony details.

arrow