logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.09.21 2016가합105037
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: 644,145,765 won to Plaintiff A; 42,195,574 won to Plaintiff B; 15,000,000 won to Plaintiff C; and 5,000 won to Plaintiff D.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The defendant is a corporation which is established for the purpose of middle and higher education and operates the Fmiddle School, G High School, H High School and I High School.

Plaintiff

A was a second-year student at I High School (hereinafter “Defendant School”) at the time of the instant accident, and based on the said Plaintiff, Plaintiff B was an adult guardian (in September 30, 2016), Plaintiff C was a mother, and Plaintiff D was a child.

Plaintiff

A’s past medical history Plaintiff A was the most shaking of NAN-type chron chronological heart disease, which is a congenital heart disease from birth, and was the most serious heart loss loss certificate, mixed-type mix beer beer, large-scale beer beer, and chronological disease comprised of the chronrone in the chrone heart, and the chronological disorder in the chrone room. “The diagnosis was conducted, and the heart surgery was conducted for eight months after the birth.

Since then, on March 8, 2010, the third grade of middle school had undergone a heart surgery (closed beer pulse), and from that time, he/she recovered from the time.

Plaintiff

Upon entering the Defendant’s school, the Plaintiff C’s notification of the Plaintiff’s surgery experience and taking-out drugs (abrupted drugs) to the Plaintiff’s school was justifiable, and the Defendant’s school also registered and managed the Plaintiff A as a student in need of protection.

On April 20, 2012, Plaintiff A, at around 14:20 on April 20, 2012, provided sports classes with the instruction of J, which is a sports teacher belonging to Defendant A, in the Defendant’s school playground.

J conducted a preparatory movement by ascertaining students who have become gymn or inconvenient before the beginning of the class, and students were allowed to voluntarily engage in sports activities in the playground.

In the process, the plaintiff A participated in the deaf-gu City Partnership (hereinafter referred to as "the deaf-gu Partnership of this case") upon the recommendation of the kind of Gu, and the city Do is difficult and the rest was withdrawn in the playground event.

arrow