logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.06.14 2019고단750
사기
Text

The defendant's judgment [2019 Highest969] and the first offense of [2019 Highest99] shall be sentenced to six months of imprisonment.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On October 31, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Daejeon District Court for fraud, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 8, 2017.

[2019 Highest 750] The defendant is a person who acts as a delivery agent at a store in the operation of the victim C in Daejeon Middle-gu, Daejeon.

1. On April 6, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, even if he/she borrowed money from the victim, he/she did not have any intent or ability to repay the money, the Defendant was transferred KRW 100,000 from the victim to the bank account in the name of the Defendant (E) by phone to the effect that “it is impossible to deliver the mobile phone, and if he/she borrowed KRW 100,000,000 from the repair cost, he/she would immediately repay the money.”

2. On April 10, 2018, the Defendant issued 400,000 won from the victim, i.e., e., e., 400,000 won from the victim, on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant, despite having no intent or ability to repay money from the victim even if he/she borrowed money; (b) the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “the victim is in need of monthly pay, if he/she lends KRW 400,000,000 to 6:0 p.m.;

3. On April 22, 2018, the Defendant issued 86,000 won from the victim, i.e., e., a loan from the victim, on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant, despite having no intent or ability to repay the loan from the victim; (b) the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “I have no balance to deliver the loan; and (c) I have to pay the balance immediately after the delivery to the victim; (d) the Defendant received 86,000 won from the victim as the loan.

4. At around April 25, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, even if he/she borrowed money from the victim, he/she did not have any intent or ability to repay the money, the Defendant would immediately repay the money to the victim in lieu of the repair cost. Accordingly, the Defendant would have the victim pay 60,000 won under F.

arrow