logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.05.02 2018고단102
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On October 15, 2013, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million for a crime of violation of road traffic law at the Dong District Court in Seoul, and a summary order of KRW 4 million for a fine of KRW 2 million for the same crime from the Sungnam Branch Support on June 27, 2016.

[Criminal facts] On January 20, 2018, the Defendant driven B low-speed car from the 0.058% fluencing route of alcohol in blood around 01:30 minutes to the 195-ro flucing path in the same city of Gwangju-si from the flucing path of the flucing Eup in Gwangju-si to the 195-ro flucing path in the same city.

As a result, the Defendant violated the prohibition regulations on drinking more than twice, and again violated the prohibition regulations on drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notice of the result of crackdown on driving drinking;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (the previous confirmation of such past history);

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentence identical to the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the defendant's age, occupation, sex, sex, family relationship, living environment, circumstances leading to the crime, etc. as stated in the record, such as the record, etc., as well as the record, that the record of the same kind of crime for the reason of sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (two times), the higher drinking volume, and the fact that the defendant's mistake is against the defendant.

arrow