Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in B.

At around 06:15 on August 25, 2013, the Defendant proceeded at a speed of about 80 km from the direction of the water level to the front of the three-distance from the upper upper part of the Sin-dong Self-Governing Zone at the speed of about 80km in the direction of the water level.

Since there was a three-distance intersection where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely proceed in accordance with the signals by reducing speed and properly examining the front left.

Nevertheless, by negligence, the defendant neglected this and proceeded with the fact that the vehicle progress signal is changed to a stop signal, and caused injury to the victim C(58 years old) who was left to the left in the direction of the water source in the direction of the water source at the site of the construction site of the luminous zone where the defendant was located on the right side of the running direction of the defendant. The defendant suffered injury to the victim E(the 39 years old), who is the passenger of the Radon car, by taking up the part of the front part of the Radon car, which was in front of the Radon car, and requiring approximately 2-day medical treatment, such as salke, etc. to the victim E(the 39 years old), who is the passenger of the Radon car, for about 6-day medical treatment, and suffered injury, respectively, such as an injury to the victim F(8 years old) who is the Radon passenger, for about 6-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing reasons of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order, including the fact that there is no criminal record of the defendant, the fact that the defendant's driver's vehicle is covered by comprehensive insurance, the victim E and F are relatives of the defendant, etc., shall be determined by taking into account the matters prescribed