logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2017.07.07 2017고단340
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

1. Defendant A

(a) The sentence against the defendant shall be ten months of imprisonment;

B. 18,800,000 won from the Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant A was sentenced to one year of suspended sentence for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Intermediation of Commercial Sex Acts, in the support of the Daegu District Court on May 20, 2016, and the decision became final and conclusive on the 28th of the same month.

Defendant

D On January 19, 2017, in support of the Daegu District Court, a person was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Acts by Forced Intrusion on Residence), and the decision was finalized on the 27th of the same month on the 20th of the same month.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A and Defendant B committed joint crimes committed on November 21, 2016: (a) from around January 21, 2016 to January 31, 2017, Defendant A acquired 60,000 won (in the case of credit card settlement, 70,000 won) out of the price to provide customers with sexual intercourse; and (b) operated the said business under the trade name of “G”, with four guest rooms equipped with shower facilities, and four employees; and (c) operated the said business under the trade name of “G”; (d) Defendant B had them reside directly in the business from around 1:00 p.m. to around 1:00 p.m.; and (e) had female employees, etc. who found the said business place engage in sexual intercourse with customers; and (e) had them operate the said business place from around 1:00 to around 1:00 on the condition that Defendant B was operating the said business at around 200 p.m.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. Defendant B, on February 1, 2017, took over the foregoing business establishment from A to the same year by the Defendant around February 1, 2017.

5. Until May, 15, the said establishment was operated by the same trade name and method as that of paragraph 1.

Accordingly, the defendant has arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

3. Defendant C was offered by around November 14, 2016 to lend the name of the said business entity to A, and the said business entity becomes the Defendant with knowledge that the said business entity is a sexual traffic business entity, who is in the name of the said business entity at the same tax office with knowledge of the fact.

arrow