1. On November 21, 2018, the Defendant’s motion to revoke the removal disposition between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s Intervenor.

The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) is a school foundation that establishes and operates the C University.

On March 1, 2014, the Plaintiff (born in 1977) was newly appointed as a faculty member of the National University of Arts and Arts, and passed an examination for reappointment in 2015, 2016, and 2018 (from March 1, 2018 to February 28, 2020).

(However, the Intervenor sent to the Plaintiff a contract for reappointment in 2018, but the Plaintiff did not sign the contract up to the present date). On April 10, 2018, the Intervenor rendered a disposition against the Plaintiff on the grounds of disciplinary action that “the Plaintiff took improper action against the third party his/her teaching.”

(2) On June 20, 2018, the first disposition was revoked on the ground that “the grounds for the first disposition are not specifically specified,” and the first disposition was revoked on June 20, 2018.

On September 3, 2018, after the intervenor took disciplinary proceedings against the plaintiff again in accordance with the above defendant's decision, the intervenor rendered the following disciplinary measures against the plaintiff on September 3, 2018 (hereinafter "instant disciplinary measure").

At around 23:00, the Plaintiff told that, at the Si University parking lot around early 2016, a female student of anonymous science (hereinafter “the female student of this case”) attending the deferred art department and a female student of this case of this case were “diver in getting off and getting off the instant female student” and went to South Korea near the instant female student’s occupation.

The Plaintiff made a key to the female student of the instant case, and subsequently made a sexual act before the mother.

On November 21, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a petition for review with the Defendant. The Plaintiff’s appeal on the ground that “the grounds for disciplinary action against the Plaintiff are recognized and the instant disposition cannot be deemed to have been abused or abused from discretionary authority.”