Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 26, 2013, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million at the Seoul Eastern District Court as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

To the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's right of defense, part of criminal records was revised.

Around 10:20 on August 10, 2019, the Defendant driven a D car at a section of about 10km from the front day of Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, to the front day of the 886-lane of the Twit-gu, Nam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul, to the 10km of the Twit-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the circumstances of the driver, report on the detection of the driver, and report on the driver;

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: Criminal history records, reply reports, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes significantly true to this court;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (The following grounds for sentencing):

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order requires strict punishment for the crime of drunk driving as well as the risk of harming the life and body of others. The revised Road Traffic Act strengthened statutory punishment for this purport.

The defendant had already been punished for the same kind of crime, but again committed a second offense.

In addition, at the time of the instant crime, the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration level cannot be deemed to be light, and the Defendant caused a traffic accident while driving in the state of driving. Therefore, the possibility of criticism is considerably high.

On the other hand, the defendant shows his attitude to recognize and reflect the crime of this case.

The defendant seems to have no record of criminal punishment except for the same kind of crime.

In addition, it seems that the above traffic accident was caused only by physical damage, which is the defendant.