1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 27, 2016, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status on May 27, 2016, and applied for refugee recognition to the Defendant on June 3, 2016.

B. On December 4, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision to recognize refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would be subject to persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.

C. As to this, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on December 20, 2017, but was dismissed on February 14, 2019.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Entry B in Evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. Although the grounds for applying for refugee status do not specifically appear in the summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion, it is written in the complaint to the effect that the application for refugee status is filed on the same grounds as the Plaintiff alleged in the procedures for refugee status screening, the Plaintiff’s assertion was arranged based on the Plaintiff’s statement at the time of the Plaintiff’

The plaintiff's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's '' owned farmland in the high-speed village of Pakistan, but the 's - B and C', a member of the National Assembly of the high-speed village, intended to purchase the above farmland in the 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's '' 's 's '' '' 's '' 's '' 's '' 's ''' 's 's 's 's '' 's '' 's 's 's ''

Therefore, there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would suffer from persecution due to the above circumstances when he returns to the Republic of Pakistan.