Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of two and half years, and by imprisonment for a period of six months.

provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2012 Highest 2528]

1. Defendant A’s embezzlement around November 20, 201: (a) around March 20, 201, Defendant A received from Nonparty B one of KRW 29.97 tons G2.97 tons of the market value of the victim F Co., Ltd., and one of KRW 3 million of the market value of the victim B, which was transferred from each of the above B, and received from the said B, while selling it for the said company, Defendant A’s embezzlement embling it by arbitrarily disposing of it.

On March 2012, the Defendant sold and delivered to H about KRW 1,500,00 of the purchase price to H, one of the above-generationrs in Gangwon-gu, Gangwon-do, and arbitrarily consumed the price.

B. On March 21, 2012, around March 21, 2012, the Defendant sold and delivered to I the above soft machine at the place specified in paragraph (a) of Article 1 to I, and arbitrarily consumed the price by office operating expenses, personal debt repayment, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victims' property.

2. On April 21, 2012, Defendant A, at the victim F Office, the F Office of the Republic of Korea J in Yangyang-si, Yangyang-si, Yangyang-si, the Defendant: “Around April 21, 2012, the Defendant sent the said company F Office, the representative director of the said company, one of K 27.5 tons, to allow the said company to rent for rent by setting out the leased fee

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to arrange the lease of the above sofacing machine to I with the mind of selling the above 17 million won to I and with the victim's false words as above, even if the above sofacing machine was delivered from the victim.

The Defendant received from the above B the above 38,50,000 won of the market price from the tin.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property by deceiving the victim.

[2012 Highest 2953] Defendant A’s fraud at the N office of the victim M management in Yangyang-si L around October 201, Defendant A, after hearing from the victim the horses that the owner of the building should supply the said furniture factory at the request of the owner of the building, and the victim “the inside land was 270 square meters to the O in Yang Nam-si, Yang Nam-si, Yangyang-si, and it would be leased after constructing the factory and the warehouse at 150 square meters among them.