The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the penalty (4 million won of a fine) imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Although the judgment of the court below is based on the following: although the defendant's mistake is recognized, it seems that the defendant is against the depth and living conditions are very difficult; there is no criminal records except the punishment imposed once due to a drunk driving crime before about 14 years; the defendant joined a mutual-aid association with the taxi operated at the time when the crime of this case was committed, the victim D (nine years of age) was compensated for medical expenses incurred during the period of hospitalized treatment; however, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant, while the defendant driving a taxi, by violating the traffic signal apparatus installed at the front direction and pedestrian protection duty at the crosswalk; the pedestrian signal at the crosswalk installed at the crosswalk; the victim's pedestrian signal installed at the crosswalk; and the victim's pedestrian protection duty at the crosswalk was damaged by the defendant's removal from the victim's vehicle; the defendant's age and circumstances leading the victim to the violation of his duty of care; and the defendant's injury to the defendant's age and circumstances before and after the commission of the crime of this case; and there were no other circumstances that the defendant suffered from the defendant's personality and behavior or damages.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.

(b).