(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.05.29 2014고정46

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.05.29 2014고정46

공무집행방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 9, 2013, from around 22:10 to 22:30, the Defendant insultingly insultingd the victim E (hereinafter “D convenience store”) who is an employee of the victim E (hereinafter “the age of 20”) with a large sound called “Chewing typia, typia, typia, frightia, farcia, farcia, farcia, farcia, and fluence in the same region” on the ground that the Defendant demanded the charge of Handphone, but was infarced.

2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s convenience store business by force by avoiding the disturbance between about 20 minutes, while putting the victim E with a large voice, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, as stated in paragraph 1.

3. Performance of official duties.

A. On October 9, 2013, at around 22:38, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 on the act indicated in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article; (b) reported 112 on October 9, 2013, the Defendant stated that “I have no obligation to carry with me any identification card; (c) I do not have any name; (d) I have any capacity to carry with me any other; (e) I have no capacity to carry with me any other; (e) I have no capacity to do so when I have come to do her, as her mother, her mother, and her mother, at any time her mother, she was called as her mother; and (e) I continued to observe this, I interfere with the Defendant’s performance of his duties by driving her slope on several occasions with the Defendant’s hand, and thereby interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties by doing so.

B. On October 9, 2013, the Defendant arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender with respect to the above act, and when the slope H et al., intended the Defendant to take a seat after the driver’s seat of the I Patrol, the Defendant took a bath to the Defendant, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the escort of a flagrant offender at one time, taking into account the left face of the slope H by hand.

Summary of Evidence

[Fact 1]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of E.

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2019.09.20 2019고단2225

-서울동부지방법원 2014.12.16 2014고단3004

-울산지방법원 2014.07.03 2014고단1386

-청주지방법원 2014.11.11 2014고단1209

-대구지방법원 2020.10.15 2020고단4108