logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.05.18 2018고단860
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B’s imprisonment for eight months, Defendant C’s fine of five million won, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A leased the office No. 11 of the 2th G shopping district in the Changwon-si, Seongbuk-gu, Sungwon-si, to operate the game room, and agreed to provide funds for purchase of the game machine and to provide settlement of profits, etc., Defendant B, the arche, leased the above game room office and registered the juvenile game providing business to the competent authority, lent each name in order to rent the above game room office and register the juvenile game providing business to the competent authority, and doing the business of lending the customer's heart and exchange to the customer at night, Defendant C, upon receiving KRW 110,000 won per day, provided that the customer's heart and exchange was conducted during night, and Defendant I conspired to conduct the business of exchanging and exchange the customer's heart at night, with Defendant I received KRW 110,00 or KRW 120,000 per day.

According to the aforementioned division of roles, the Defendants are clearly stated in this part of the indictment that was written in around February 12, 2018 from the police officer around December 2, 2017 to February 12, 2018, and thus, the above correction is ex officio.

In the foregoing “H Gameland”, 20 game machine 20 and 30 game machine 20 or 20 game machine 30 or 40 game machine 20 or 40 game machine 30 or 40 Madro-Ba Mala, which provided the said game machine to many and unspecified customers, and exchanged the said game machine into cash with 10% other than the following fee per one 10% for each game result obtained using the said game machine to customers.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to exchange the results obtained through the use of game products for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant D by the prosecution;

1. Part of the protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the defendant A by the prosecution;

1. Written Statement;

1. Each investigation report (C’s “H Gameland” period and co-offenders, investigation into actual business owners of H Gameland, attachment of A’s business instructions to Kakao Stockholm messages, hearing of certified intermediaries’ telephone statements, and reporting on communication confirmation analysis.

arrow