The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although the Defendant did not arrange a female contact loan as stated in paragraph (2) of the facts charged, the lower court convicted the Defendant by misunderstanding the fact and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the grounds of unfair sentencing (the fine of KRW 3,000,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below on the erroneous determination of facts, ① F and E have consistently met with the investigative agency to the court below's decision and stated that there was two female-dominations in F and E. ② The video CDs taken by the defendant's singing room are 20,000 won or more when the customer makes a settlement in the singing room; ② The statement that the male-dominations' male-dominations' payment is 25,000 won or more, including the fee, was demanded by F, etc. to first put them into the singing; ② the statement that the female-dominations' female-dominations' payment was difficult to be made by the male-dominations' payment; ④ The male-dominations' payment was made by F and F, etc.; ⑤ The male-dominations' statement that the male-dominations' payment was made by F and F, etc.

In full view of the above facts and circumstances, the Defendant.