Text
1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;
2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff (competent: the jurisdiction of the Incheon Kandong Branch) on March 19, 2014, the first comprehensive foreign currency payment guarantee agreement and credit transaction agreement and debt redemption 1) is a stock company C (hereinafter “foreign company”) on March 19, 2014.
(B) As to the import transaction of the non-party company, the foreign exchange transaction agreement on the issuance of the credit in relation to the non-party company's import transaction is entered into as well as USD 900,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
A) Around this time, B, the representative director of the non-party company, limited the obligations owed to the plaintiff of the non-party company due to the above agreement to USD 1,80,000,000. 2) The plaintiff (the jurisdiction of the Incheon Twitdong Branch) was based on the first payment guarantee agreement on March 19, 2014, and opened two imported letters of credit as follows.
On March 19, 2014, E 199,222.00 TYATRCO CO on April 90, 2014, the effective date of the credit number (USD) beneficiary issuance date D 699,982.50, XIN HITD 19,222.00 TYO CO on March 19, 2014, the non-party company repaid the debt incurred to the Plaintiff (competent Dong Dongdong Branch in Incheon) on July 10, 2014, with the first credit payment guarantee agreement and credit payment guarantee agreement concluded between the non-party company and the non-party company on July 10, 2014 (the active branch in charge of the second comprehensive foreign exchange transaction agreement and credit payment guarantee agreement).
B At the time, the non-party company's obligation to the plaintiff was guaranteed to the extent of USD 537,90 in the United States.
The settlement period of F828,184.52 TYO TYO TST COM CO. CO. 2014.