logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.05.16 2018고정1595
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is an infant in charge of BA, and the victim C (V, 37 years of age) is an employee in charge of BA.

At around 16:10 on April 27, 2018, the Defendant: (a) opened a toilet column in which the victim was the victim on the ground that the victim was given a refund to the private teaching institute located in the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant sustained an injury on the left-hand knee, knee, the left-hand knee, etc. in need of medical treatment for about 14 days on the ground that the victim was given a refund to the private teaching institute located in the port; (b) opened a toilet column in which the victim was the victim; and (c) opened the victim’s head knife onto the kne; and

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness C, E, F, and G;

1. Statement of each police statement related to C and G;

1. Each statement of C, G, E, and F;

1. CCTV images;

1. CCTV photographs;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. The victim C has consistently stated the background of the instant case, the method of violence against the Defendant, and the degree and degree of injury, etc. in the instant case from an investigative agency to the instant court. The victim’s statement conforms to the evidence of the CD videos, etc. duly adopted and duly adopted and investigated by the instant court, and thus, has credibility without any special inconsistency. Furthermore, the victim was issued a written diagnosis at a hospital located in two locations due to the diagnosis, the following day, the pain and the pain of the parts, and the degree of injury alleged by the victim in each injury diagnosis statement, and the degree and degree of injury are consistent with the circumstances alleged by the victim (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2012Do2631, Jun. 28, 2012). As such, the victim C consistently stated the instant medical examination from the investigative agency to the instant court. The victim’s statement conforms to the evidence of the CD videos video images, etc. duly adopted and examined by the instant court.

Considering the foregoing, the court shall take into account.

arrow