logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.10.30 2014노132
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The victims of the grounds for appeal did not receive or take medical treatment after receiving the medical treatment on the date of the instant accident.

The victims cannot be deemed to have suffered injury due to the instant accident, and even if they suffered injury, it cannot be deemed that there was a situation requiring relief measures because the degree of injury was very insignificant.

The Defendant, without entirely recognizing that the victims had been injured due to the instant accident, was trying to take the taxi passengers first to the destination, and went out of the place of the instant accident.

2. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., the victim H was out of, and the head of, the inner diameter used as the shock of the instant accident. The victim H appealed to J Hospital immediately after the instant accident and complained of the doctor with the back and head pains; ② the victim F was inside the J Hospital on the date of the instant accident, and seems to have appealed to the right-hand slots; ③ the victim H’s diagnosis report on the victims stated that the victim H was “the brain sale, salute, and tensions of the salute,” and the victim F stated that the victim F was in need of medical treatment for each two weeks as “the salute in the front left-hand slots,” ④ the victim’s front and the victim’s vehicle driven by the Defendant cannot be considered to have been destroyed by the front and the accident immediately after the instant accident, and the victim’s accident could not be considered to have been found to have been relatively objectively and clearly resolved.

arrow