The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant and C, who are serving as public interest personnel, will receive a loan with friendship C and money, and call to the victims of the high-school alumni C, and will receive a loan from them, and will complete the loan with the Defendant and C.

The proposal leads to the victim.

On March 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the counseling office of the Myeon Office of Asia-si, Asan City between 17:00 to 18:00, the Defendant: (b) provided the victim with a small amount of loans by phone call to E, and (c) decided to appoint the party members to the

After the victim's grandchildren were taken, the victim's left descendants were left behind, and the victim's grandchildren were 3 times back by putting the victim's shoulder and putting them into the victim's upper part.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed indecent act against the victim by assault.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the evidence alone presented by the prosecutor is insufficient to recognize the facts charged.

(1) The victim’s investigative agencies and legal statements that seem to correspond to the facts charged are difficult to believe as they are for the following reasons.

The victim of the crime committed an indecent act or rape from the original Defendant, and also stated in the integrated support center for the victims of sexual assault and the police that “the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim, as described in the facts charged, as well as the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim, and was forced to leave the victim on the part of the bet, and exceeded, and raped.”

However, after the war, the victim was in F with the Defendant and F, divided the message to the effect that “the Defendant did not rape himself and that such accusation is false,” and divided the message to the same effect as the victim’s mother through F. In fact, the prosecution prosecuted the Defendant only against the charge of forced indecent conduct, not rape.

On the other hand, the victim is "it is true that he/she has been raped by the defendant" in the court.