1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant Nobable Construction Co., Ltd. shall have the fourth 272.09 square meters of the building indicated in the attached Table 1 list.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff and C jointly own the buildings listed in the separate sheet No. 1.

B. On March 30, 2012, the Plaintiff and C leased the four-story 272.09 square meters (around 83 square meters; hereinafter “instant building”) among the above buildings to the Defendant Company on the following terms (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”); and the “rent, etc.” to be paid monthly by the Defendant Company is KRW 3,150,400 per month [a value-added tax of KRW 664,00 for the management fee of KRW 2.2 million x KRW 8,000 for the rent of KRW 83 square meters].

1) The Plaintiff’s side ordered the instant building by April 30, 2012, with a lease deposit of KRW 30 million, monthly rent of KRW 2.2 million. The lease term shall be from May 30, 2012 to 24 months, and the monthly rent shall also be from May 30, 2012 to 30, the Defendant Company shall separately bear all taxes and public charges other than property taxes, such as value-added tax, management expenses (including KRW 8,00, electricity charges, water charges, gas charges, waste collection charges, environmental improvement charges, and charges for causing traffic congestion.

C. 1) The Defendant Company, while delaying rent, etc. from the beginning on October 1, 2012, paid a total of KRW 220 million on December 5, 2012, KRW 10 million on June 18, 2013, KRW 24.2 million on June 30, 2013, and KRW 2,4.2 million on June 30, 2013. (2) As of the end of February 2014, the Defendant Company did not pay KRW 2,357,705 in total, including electric charges (including overdue charges) and charges for causing traffic congestion.

The Defendant Company ordered Defendant B to do so after the lease contract of this case.

항 기재 ㈎ 부분(이하 ‘이 사건 점포’라 한다)을 무단 전대하였고, 피고 B은 이 사건 점포에서 뷰티샵을 운영하고 있다.

E. On October 30, 2013, C transferred to the Plaintiff various claims related to the instant building to the Defendants, and the Plaintiff, who accepted the notification right from C, notified the Defendants of the transfer of the said claim by serving the instant complaint on the Defendants.

F. The plaintiff is the lease of this case on the ground that the service of the complaint of this case to the defendant company was "two or more rents in arrears and illegal subleases".