1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the designated parties, excluding M, T, and U, and the defendant (appointed parties).

1. Basic facts

A. (1) On March 23, 2006, the Mayor of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government publicly announced approximately KRW 26,009.89 square meters as an urban and residential environment improvement zone as a planned zone for the establishment of the Plaintiff Union. As such, A district Housing Reconstruction Promotion Committee (hereinafter “instant Promotion Committee”) was organized for the purpose of implementing a housing reconstruction project in the said planned zone, and obtained approval from the head of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from the head of the Gu on December 29, 2006 (hereinafter “instant approval for the formation of the Promotion Committee”).

(2) On December 24, 2009, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor publicly announced the designation of the rearrangement zone and the formulation of the rearrangement plan with respect to the land of approximately 23,260 square meters of the daily P unit of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant rearrangement zone”).

(3) On July 20, 2012, the Plaintiff Union obtained the authorization of establishment from the head of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government pursuant to Article 16 of the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (amended by Act No. 11293, Feb. 1, 2012; hereinafter “Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents”).

(4) On December 13, 2012, the Plaintiff Union filed a lawsuit claiming the transfer of ownership following the exercise of a right to demand sale (hereinafter “the lawsuit claiming the transfer of ownership”) with the Seoul Western District Court Decision 2012Da13774 and the same court Decision 2012Ga13781.

(5) On September 5, 2012, part of the owners of land, etc. who oppose the establishment of Q et al. filed an administrative appeal seeking confirmation of invalidity of a prior approval to establish an association with the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Administrative Appeals Commission. On January 14, 2013, the said administrative appeals commission rendered an adjudication to confirm that the prior approval to establish an association is invalid due to a grave and apparent defect that failed to meet

(6) Accordingly, the Plaintiff Union filed a lawsuit against the Seoul Administrative Appeals Commission under the Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2013Guhap8431, but the said judgment was revoked on October 24, 2013.