Defendant

B Imprisonment with prison labor of 6 months, Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of 1,000,000 won.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 20, 2016, Defendant A, at around 18:45, 2016, she saw the victim B (58 tax) and the above-mentioned problem with the soil salt plant in front of Gangseo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D, and she heard the victim’s desire to “hump flasing the horses” from the injured party, and she fladdd the victim’s hum.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim in the vicinity of the unknown neck that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. As described in paragraph 1, Defendant B, as the victim A (the 65 years old) was fluorted, fluording the victim’s arms against the victim and fluoring the victim’s chests, and fluoring the victim’s chests over the floor.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as 12 chest pressure pressure, which requires approximately 8 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. Each legal statement of witness A, E, and F;

1. On-site photographs and A photograph of the suspect;

1. A medical certificate of injury (A), opinion, and medical certificate (B);

1. Medical treatment records;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (as to the confirmation of suspect A submitted MRI images);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The choice of the defendant B, who is sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor, and a fine against the defendant A

1. Defendant A who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (The conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing as set forth below);

1. Defendant A: Determination on the assertion by the Defendant B and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Although Defendant B’s assertion is a fact that Defendant B spreads the Victim A’s arms, it is not a fact that her chests.

2. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by this court, Defendant B suffered an injury by harming the victim A.

It is reasonable to view it.

(1) A victim;