(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.11.13 2018고단3181

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.11.13 2018고단3181

전자금융거래법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in any other Act, no one shall lend, lend, store, deliver or distribute any access medium while receiving, demanding or promising the payment of the price in return for the use and management of any access medium for electronic financial transactions.

In doing so, the Defendant reported the advertisement posted on Internet B at the early August 2018, and contacted the name and influencing staff using C. C.C. name “D”, “E”, and “F”. On August 13, 2018, the Defendant received the proposal that “on the face of delivery by receiving and sending a home-type box with a physical card, it would pay KRW 50,000 won per each page” from the employees of C. In response, the Defendant sent the physical card to the order of the employees of C.S. and intended to receive the payment of the price.

Accordingly, on September 7, 2018, the Defendant received the physical check from the name in the exit of 13:00 at the entrance of the Seoul metropolitan unit “E” from the name in the name in the name in the middle of 2018, the Defendant received the physical check from 13:0 on the same day, and received the KEB one physical card from the name in the front of the exit around 4:00 at the entrance of Dobong-dong Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and received the password from the name in the name in the name in the name in the middle of 3:0, and received the password from the name in the name in the name in the (C vice name E).

Then on the same day, the Defendant received the direction of “B 4 Ma-ro 4 in the exit of 3:59” from the Defendant’s name in light of 20:52, the Defendant received the order of “B-ro 4 in the exit of 20:52, and 4 in the front of the exit of Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, and 3, from G, the Defendant received one copy of the MaGG Saemaul Undong Card C-ro 4 in the front of the exit of 20:59 on the same day.

As a result, the defendant paid compensation to the defendant, and kept it by receiving access media from a person who is not his name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of the reporting legislation to the result of a program for submitting smartphone evidence.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2018.08.30 2018고단5112

-청주지방법원 2016.06.17 2016고단783

-인천지방법원 2018.03.23 2018고단681

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.07 2017고단8105

-의정부지방법원 2017.06.02 2017고단1620