logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.04.29 2014고정4446
폭행치상등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 7, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at the Seoul High Court on January 7, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 24, 2016.

The defendant of "2014 High 446" is the owner of the building in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City and the victim D(42 taxes and South) has exercised the right of retention due to the delayed payment of the construction cost in the above building.

On June 21, 2014, at the entrance of the elevator of the above building around 22:10, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as: (b) the victim’s chests to the upper part of the building by cutting down the victim’s chests over the upper part; (c) the victim’s chests to the upper part of the building; and (d) the victim was pushed down.

Accordingly, the defendant suffered bodily injury, such as a scarcity pain, which requires treatment for about 14 days by committing assault to the victim.

around 14:00 on April 24, 2014, the Defendant, “2015 High 1513, the Defendant, at around 1513, inflicted injury on the Defendant’s hand, on the part of the victim’s left hand and flaps, on the ground that the victim attempted to open a site attached to the power distribution board “in the course of exercising the right of retention” on the 1st floor of the building C, on the ground that the victim obstructed and restrains the use of the land and flaps, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

[2014 High 446]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the police officers of the accused;

1. Protocols of examination of witnesses regarding D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Previous convictions: References to inquiries, such as criminal history, one copy of the judgment, and the results of case search “2015 Gohap 1513”;

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each protocol of examination of witness witness D and E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Previous convictions: References to inquiries, such as criminal history, text of judgment, application of Acts and subordinate statutes as a result of case search;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning the crime, Articles 262, 260(1) (the point of causing violence) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) (the point of causing violence) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for negligence as to the crime;

1. The latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code for the treatment of concurrent crimes, provided that Article 39 Section 1.1.

arrow