beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Criminal facts
1. On December 10, 2012, the Defendant called that “A victim C, who was aware of a usual place at the early police station, was phoneed to the victim C and provided the victim C with one unit of 1 unit and one unit of 1 unit of 1 unit of 1 unit and 30 million unit of 1 unit of 1 unit and 1 unit of 1 unit of 1 unit of 1 unit of 1 unit of 1 unit of 1 unit of 1 unit of 1 unit of 201 and one unit of 1 unit of 1 unit of 1 unit of 30 million unit of 1 unit of 201.”
However, under the circumstances where the Defendant was liable for financial rights equivalent to KRW 80,00 and KRW 1,30,000,000 at the time, the Defendant was under pressure on the repayment of security loans and credit card payments, as the vehicle purchase funds necessary for the operation of the used vehicle sales company are 60,000 won and the vehicle purchase funds are 60,000 won and the vehicle borrowed as security is not good, and thus, the Defendant was under pressure on the repayment of security loans and credit card payments. The said vehicles offered as security by the Defendant are not all the Defendant’s names, but all the said vehicles offered as security by receiving the funds from the middle and the second and second purchased vehicles, and the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the funds even if having borrowed money from the victim.
On December 10, 2012, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 30 million won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant, and acquired it by fraud.
2. On December 12, 2012, the Defendant called “Around December 12, 2012, the Defendant: “Around December 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) called the victim at an unexpected place; (b) lent KRW 10 million as he/she urgently needs to pay money; (c) the vehicle assigned to him/her at the same time during the past; and (d) would instead provide the GLK as a collateral.”
However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, the Defendant was under pressure to pay the employee’s wages, card payments, and customer goods because the D operation operated by himself/herself in the above debt situation, and not only is the vehicle under the name of the Defendant, but also the benz vehicle provided as security.