Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On July 17, 2014, A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for breach of trust, etc. by Busan High Court and three years of suspended execution, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 25, 2014.

Defendant

A is the actual operator of P, Seo-gu, Busan (State) No. 4, 910, and Defendant B is the operator of F in Busan, Seo-gu, 716.

Defendant

A applied for a guarantee of purchase funds to the Credit Guarantee Fund on October 7, 2011, and the Credit Guarantee Fund agreed to guarantee the amount of KRW 90 million out of the loans of financial institutions to purchase funds.

The Defendants pretended to purchase goods from the EF, they received a loan under the guarantee of the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund, and used the loan for other purposes.

On July 6, 2012, the Defendants filed an application for a loan equivalent to KRW 100 million from the EE EF as if they were to purchase ear, and received a guarantee from the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund and received KRW 100 million from the victims’ Enterprise Bank Account (G) and then re-transfer the money to the ( state) Enterprise Bank Account (H) and used it as the business funds of the E.

The fact was that (State) E had not purchased 100 million won from F.

The Defendants, including this, conspired and acquired the total amount of KRW 200 million by deceiving the victim on two occasions, such as the list of crimes in the attached list.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to I and J;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, (A) and Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (defendant A and his/her relationship);

1. Relevant Articles 347(1) and 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the Defendants who choose to commit the crime;

1. Defendant A who handles concurrent crimes: After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1);

1. The Defendants aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act.