A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was detained by the victim B who was living together at the beginning of June 2009, and was asked by the victim to appoint a lawyer by using the agricultural bank account consisting of money owned by the victim. On June 14, 2009, the defendant received the cash card from the victim's mother-friendly D from the victim's mother-friendly 106 Dong 703, 200.

At around 10:0 on June 15, 200 on June 15, 2009, the Defendant: (a) entered the cash automatic withdrawal machine installed at the Dong branch of the Agricultural Cooperatives, instead of the Agricultural Cooperatives Association located in the Northern-dong, Mapo-si, the said cash card, and then remitted KRW 6 million to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of E, from June 25, 2009, from that time, he remitted or withdraws KRW 95.9 million to another account four times from June 25, 2009, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes, and used it at the expense of the victim’s attorney-at-law.

As a result, the defendant, without authority, entered remittance amount, withdrawal amount and password in an automatic cash withdrawal machine, remitted or withdrawn 95 million won or more than 15 million won for attorney-at-law delegated by the victim, and obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to 80.9 million won, which is the difference.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police statement made against D and B;

1. Investigation reports (verification of accounts and details of transactions, etc.);

1. Application of written confirmation of details of transactions statutes;

1. Even though the amount acquired by the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 347-2 of the Criminal Code and Article 347-2 of the Criminal Code for criminal facts is a large amount, damage recovery has not been made until now or the victim has not received a letter of punishment from the victim, and the victim has wanted the strict punishment of the defendant.

In light of the circumstances and methods leading to the instant crime, it is not good that the instant crime has been committed, and the liability for the crime is not easy.

Defendant is allowed to commit the same kind of crime.