1. The Defendant’s KRW 28,193,516 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from January 17, 2012 to November 29, 2013.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 3, 2008, the Plaintiff visited C Hospital operated by the Defendant to undergo a pelvis surgery (hereinafter “the primary surgery”) and a physical therapy due to an accident beyond mountain (hereinafter “the instant injury”). B. On July 21, 2008, the Plaintiff continued to undergo a medical examination conducted at the astronomical Matern Hospital on the following occasions: (a) received a diagnosis that the surgery needs to be conducted because the surgery is not appropriate; and (b) received a pelvis surgery from the Defendant on September 24, 2008 (hereinafter “the second surgery”).

C. After the second surgery, the Plaintiff visited the D’s hospital on October 2009, with the result of a medical examination, without the pain of the operation department, and with symptoms of the side race, etc., the Plaintiff was confirmed to be satisfying, satisfying, and chronic dystypitis, and received a satfying satfying satfying sat, as the result of the medical examination.

Nevertheless, since the symptoms are not shown, the plaintiff was found to have deteriorated as a result of the medical examination conducted by the Seoul Metropolitan Hospital on February 2011, and received a re-operation.

C. As a result of the veterinary surgery, the Plaintiff left a chest in a water area, such as the scar of the right arms, and the spelitis was cured, and the pelvis pelvis was recovered, and the pelvis pelvis was found to have disabilities, such as the pelvis pelvis, the pelvis pelvis, the pelvis part of the pelvis ma, and the pelvis part of the pelvis pelvis.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, each entry of Gap evidence 1 through 7 (including each number if there is a satisfy number), the result of physical appraisal, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. In full view of the Defendant’s negligence and causation Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 9 (including each number, if any), the physical examination result, and the overall purport of the pleadings as a result of the examination of the supplementation of medical records, the entire arguments are as follows: (i) in the case of the Plaintiff’s salone of the salone salone salone salone s