The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the Defendant has a large number of records of punishment for the same kind of crime; (b) in the event of the withdrawal of alcohol, the Defendant fluencing violence to the surrounding persons without any justifiable reason; and (c) the victim’s degree of damage is very high; and (d) the victim’s degree of damage is not easy.

2. In light of the unfavorable circumstances pointed out by the public prosecutor, and the fact that the defendant repeatedly commits a crime when drinking alcohol, warning to the defendant is needed to comply with the prevention of recidivism.

However, it is reasonable to maintain the sentence imposed by the court below in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the defendant has been divided in depth into the defendant; (b) the victim C and D agreed with the victim G; and (c) other victim C and D accepted the intention of the mother and child of the defendant in the case of other victim C and D; and (d) the circumstances in which the defendant used the defendant (see evidence records 69 pages); and (b) other various circumstances, including the defendant’s age, character and conduct, are considered as conditions for sentencing

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.