logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.01.20 2015가단42570
부당이득금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On October 9, 2014, at around 00:30 on October 9, 2014, vehicles A (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”) are located in front of the front door of the Southern-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Forest Defense School.

(B)A vehicle parked on the road (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff vehicle”);

) The collisioned traffic accident occurred (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive insurance contract on the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive insurance contract on the Defendant’s vehicle.

3) As to the existence and scope of liability under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, etc., 14 insurance companies including the Plaintiff and the Defendant, with the aim of rationally and economically resolving disputes arising between insurers (Article 1). The deliberation committee, which is a decision-making authority to mediate and resolve disputes on the concept between the contracting companies (Article 10). The agreement-making company first requested the deliberation committee to deliberate on disputes on the concept of compensation (Article 17, 18), if the claimant or the respondent did not make a request for reexamination or file a lawsuit within 14 days from the date of receiving the notice of decision-making of the deliberation committee, the decision of the deliberation committee shall be finalized (Article 27), and if the decision of the deliberation committee becomes final and conclusive, it shall be deemed that the agreement between the claimant and the respondent has the same effect as that of the written decision-making (Article 28). 4) The deliberation committee established under the said mutual agreement has concluded a mutual agreement on the claim for the compensation of the Defendant against the Plaintiff, which is 10% on April 27, 20197.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant decision”) 5 Plaintiff.

arrow