logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.08.28 2014고단2012
공갈
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 2013, the Defendant, as a member of the organized violence group belonging to the International PPJP, received a request from the victim D (Nam, 44 years old) who intends to establish a research company called 'C' from the victim D (which was named 'C', and received a request from the victim D (the South and the North 44 years old) for the establishment of the research company, and subsequently, the Defendant would receive a certain amount of expenses for receiving orders from the Corporation for the sake of 'C'.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on the ground that he is the representative director in his name, received money from the victim for monthly salary, and found it as the “F” construction site executed by the victim in Seo-gu in Gwangju, Seo-gu, Gwangju, around 12:00 on June 9, 2013, demanded that the victim “the representative director need to pay KRW 2 million,” but he also heard the victim’s statement that “I need to pay KRW 2 million, such as the receipt of orders from the victim.”

Accordingly, the Defendant was transferred KRW 2,00,000 from the Defendant’s account in the name of the Defendant around June 10, 2013 to the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of the Defendant, on the following grounds: (a) whether the Defendant is the representative of the company, and whether the Plaintiff entered a large number of media companies, and whether the completion of the F Corporation once is confirmed; and (b) the Defendant was committed as if the Defendant interfered with or delayed the Victim’s construction completion permission.

2. Since then, the Defendant received money on a regular basis from the said victim D, using the fact that he was the representative director of the said victim’s name “(C)C”, but did not take place, the Defendant did not intend to receive money from the said victim D on a regular basis, such as causing the victim to an accounting document related to “(C)C”, with pressure and pressure, leading the victim to receive money in the name of the activity expenses from the victim, and, on July 2, 2013, with the victim D or with all corporate documents, such as a statement of money entering and leaving the company, a passbook, and a tax invoice related to construction executed before the bank.”

arrow