1. The Defendants stated the “share to be registered for transfer” in the attached Table 2 in the 35 square meters of the forest land B when smuggling to the Plaintiff.

1. On January 6, 1936, the forests and fields described in Paragraph 1 of the Disposition of the Judgment (hereinafter “the forests and fields of this case”) are recorded as D in the current register and closed register. However, the original register is recorded as C, C’s permanent domicile is entered as “Styang E”. Since the current register’s address is entered as “Styang-gun E,” it is consistent with C’s above permanent domicile, and C was born as of the F date, it is reasonable to view that D, which is created as the right holder of 1/4 share, was registered as one-fourth of the current register, G, net, and LI’s respective shares, and the Defendants were currently recorded as the heir of the Plaintiff and the heir of the Plaintiff, the heir of the Plaintiff and the heir of the deceased and the Defendants’ heir of the deceased and the Plaintiff’s heir of the deceased and the Plaintiff’s heir of the deceased and the Plaintiff’s heir of the deceased and the Defendants’ heir of the deceased and the Defendant’s heir of the deceased were found to have agreed to the remainder of the deceased and forest of this case.

According to the above facts, the plaintiff and the deceased J have occupied the forest of this case for not less than 20 years and completed the prescriptive acquisition, and the plaintiff has no change in the owner of the forest of this case during that period, and the time of voluntary commencement can be considered as the starting point.

Therefore, the Defendants are obligated to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer on January 31, 2017 with respect to each share indicated in the “share for transfer registration” in the attached Table 2, among the forest land in the instant case, to the Plaintiff.

2. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is with merit.