A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a flag and wholesale retail business with the trade name “E” in Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si, and the victim F is a G successor training assistant for important intangible cultural heritage, and the victim F was a person who, under the direction of the I (Death on June 20, 2013) of the Cultural Heritage Administration, has overall control over the production and supply of the traditional flag for the restoration of H, under the direction of the I (A) of important intangible cultural heritage as a manufacturer.

Around August 26, 2014, the Defendant sent a interview to the J company K’s office “(L)” to the Defendant’s “(H) 15,000 pages and 15,000 pages and 15,000 pages were to go to H restoration work. At the police station, the Defendant followed the Defendant’s “Net-si Sick-si Sick-si.” The Defendant followed the Defendant’s news at around 22,00, 15,000, which was produced and supplied as machinery by Defendant’s operating company rather than by traditional method, and the Defendant’s news at around 20,000, which was 15,000 if the Defendant’s news was produced and supplied as machinery.” The Defendant’s news at around 205:5, the following day and the Defendant’s news at around 208, 2014, which was the Defendant’s news on August 27, 2014.”

On August 27, 2014, the Defendant had an interview with the content that “at the time of a request for the production of cultural heritage repair, there was a 15,000 copies of 15,00 from the time of 2012, the Defendant received a telephone from a Pr of the O company in the vicinity of the Young-dong Expressway Highway, and supplied it to the Pr,” and affixed the following seals thereon.

8. On the Internet newspaper of 28.28. The above interview content was quoted and reported under the title " Q".

However, the defendant did not supply the machinery produced by the defendant's company and 15,000 parts of the machinery to the victim, and it was requested by the victim to produce the machinery to be used for the repair of cultural heritage, or the products of the defendant's company were used in the H restoration project.