1. Of the part concerning the counterclaim in the judgment of the court of first instance, the amount equivalent to the following amount ordered to be paid (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

1. The reasoning for this part of the facts admitted by the court is as stated in Paragraph 1 of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. Determination

A. Of the principal lawsuit, the Plaintiff’s claim for restitution of unjust enrichment was 1) based on the Plaintiff’s claim and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (“Defendant C”)’s agreement to share one-third share of the instant land by the “verification of real estate position and consent to use” as stated in Section 1-E of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Nevertheless, with respect to the Plaintiff’s share of 1,653/7,041 out of the instant land, the ownership transfer registration was completed with respect to the Plaintiff’s share of 3,735/7,041 out of the instant land, and the Plaintiff’s share of 3,735/7,000 KRW 594,840,000 after the auction procedure for the instant land was conducted. The Plaintiff’s share of 1/3 out of the instant land was sold to the Plaintiff, and the share of 1/60 of the instant land was finally registered to the Defendant B for 1/360,7149 of the instant title trust agreement.

The Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder's Name;