Defendant

In addition, the appeal by the person who requested the attachment order is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court’s sentencing (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s improper order to attach an electronic tracking device to the Defendant is unjust because it is unfair or too long to order the Defendant to attach an electronic tracking device.

2. The crime of this case regarding the part of the Defendant’s case is a crime committed before the judgment of another case becomes final and conclusive, and the equity with the case to be judged is to be considered at the same time. At the time of the crime of this case, the Defendant was a minor, and the Defendant’s confessions all of the crimes of this case and commits

However, in light of the fact that the crime of this case was committed against the victim who is a juvenile, not only by the defendant, but also by posting a false letter of sales of clothing several times, and that the crime was committed by deceiving money from several victims, and that the punishment of this case is very heavy, and that the judgment became final and conclusive with regard to H in the relation of the defendant and his accomplice, and other all the sentencing conditions against the defendant, the sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable.

This part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The judgment of the court below that ordered the attachment of an electronic tracking device on the ground that the defendant's criminal records committed a sexual crime of a manual similar to the crime of this case in the previous time are recognized, and that the criminal records were committed against persons under the age of 19, and that the degree of "high or intermediate" was assessed from the evaluation level of the risk of recidivism by sexual offenders committed by the probation office, and that other criminal records, character and behavior, environment, etc. of the defendant are deemed to pose a risk of recidivism of sexual crimes and recidivism.

This part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.

4. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is specified as without merit.